All contributions submitted to the journal that are selected for peer-review are sent to at least one, but usually two or more, independent reviewers, selected by the editors. From different types of peer-review, Double-Blind Review was selected to use; both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous. Author anonymity prevents any reviewer bias based on the author’s country of origin or previous controversial work. Articles written by prestigious or renowned authors are considered based on the content of their papers, rather than on the author’s reputation. The journal is committed to providing an efficient service for both, authors and readers. Our blind peer-review system along with the editorial board of independent editors provides a mean of rapid and fair publication decisions. Same time in case of a conflict in the double-blind reviewing, a clear or semi-blind reviewing is suggested. Full peer-review process including editorial workflow can be understood through the following flow chart: